Library of expert validated exploits for safe and effective pen tests
Exploit development can be an advanced penetration testing skill that takes time to master. Additionally, when on a job, pen testers often don’t have the resources to create a new exploit. Many resort to searching for and using pre-written exploits that have not been tested and must go through the timely effort of quality assurance testing in order to ensure they are secure and effective.
Core Impact users can save time by finding all the up-to-date exploits they need in one place. We provide a robust library of exploits designed to enable pen testers to safely and efficiently conduct successful penetration tests. Whether written by our own internal team or by a third party like ExCraft, you can trust they have been thoroughly tested and validated by our experts.
The universe of vulnerabilities is huge and not all of them represent the same risk for the customers. Vulnerabilities do not all have the same level of criticality. Some may be easily exploitable by a low-level user, while others may not be exploitable at all. To increase the efficiency of the attacks and the quality of the exploits provided, the Core Impact team has developed selection criteria to prioritize its analysis and implementation. We determine which exploits warrant creation based on the following questions:
What are the most critical attacks from the attacker’s perspective?
What new vulnerabilities are more likely to be exploited in real attacks?
What exploits are the most valuable for Core Impact?
Once an exploit is approved, its priority order considers the following variables:
Vulnerability Properties: CVE, disclosure date, access mechanism and privileges needed.
Target Environment Setup: OS, application prevalence, version and special configurations needed.
Value Provided to Core Impact: Customer request, usage in multiple attacks, allows the installation of an agent, etc.
Technical Cost vs. Benefit: An analysis weighing the resources needed to build an exploit with the internal and external knowledge gained in its creation.
Each one of these variables has a different weight and provides a ranking of the potential exploits to be developed. Following those criteria, the top of the list would contain, for example, a vulnerability on Windows (most popular OS) that can be exploited remotely, without authentication and that provides super user privileges.
Correspondingly, a vulnerability on an application that is rarely installed, needs special configurations, and requires User Interaction, would be at the bottom.
Stay Informed of New Core Certified Exploits
Subscribe to receive regular email updates on new exploits available for Core Impact
Browse the Core Certified Exploit Library
We provide pen testers with real-time updates for a wide range of exploits for different platforms, operating systems, and applications.
Search our continuously growing library to discover an exploit that will allow you to gain and retain access on the target host or application.
Title
Description
Date Added
CVE Link
Exploit Platform
Exploit Type
Product Name
Vulnerabilities tab in Quick Information view Update
This update resolves an issue with displaying certain vulnerabilities in the Quick Information view.
Exploits / Remote
Impact Professional
ATI Technologies Driver atillk64 Kernel Arbitrary Read Write Local Privilege Escalation Exploit
AMD ATI atillk64 allows low-privileged users to interact directly with physical memory by calling one of several driver routines that map physical memory into the virtual address space of the calling process. This could enable low-privileged users to achieve NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM privileges via a DeviceIoControl call associated with MmMapIoSpace, IoAllocateMdl, MmBuildMdlForNonPagedPool, or MmMapLockedPages.
Oracle Weblogic Server T3 UniversalExtractor JNDI injection getDatabaseMetaData Remote Code Execution Exploit Update
An unauthenticated java deserialization vulnerability via T3 protocol in Oracle Weblogic Server allows an attacker to upload and execute a java class file to gain arbitrary code execution on the affected system.
Microsoft Windows OLE Property Code Execution Exploit (MS11-093)
Microsoft Windows does not properly handle OLE objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted object within a file.
Microsoft Internet Explorer XML Core Services MSXML Uninitialized Memory Exploit
Microsoft XML Core Services 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0, as used by Internet Explorer, accesses uninitialized memory locations, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by enticing an unsuspecting user to visit a specially crafted web site.
VLC Media Player libmodplug Buffer Overflow Exploit Update
VLC Media Player is prone to a buffer overflow vulnerability due to insufficient validation of user supplied data. An attacker is able to execute arbitrary code in the context of the user when opening malicious .S3M media files.
Amovision AM-Q6320-WIFI HD Camera Remote Configuration Disclosure
Amovision AM-Q6320-WIFI HD Camera Remote Configuration Disclosure
Exploits / Client Side
IOT
GE Proficy CIMPLICITY gefebt Remote Code Execution
The vulnerable component gefebt allows to execute remote BCL files in
shared resources. An attacker can abuse this behaviour to execute a malicious BCL and drop an arbitrary EXE .This can be executed remotely through the WebView server.
MaxSystems Inc MaxRegLib2 ctListBar.ocx ActiveX Control Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
This module will receive HTTP requests from vulnerable clients and install agents on them.
Exploits / Client Side
MEDICAL
LEADTOOLS Medical ActiveX BrowseDir() Remote Overflow
This module will listen for HTTP requests from vulnerable clients and queue client side exploits as HTTP responses in an attempt to install an OS agent on the client.
Exploits / Client Side
MEDICAL
RPT Remote Exploits Timeout Update
This update corrects timeouts in different remote exploits.
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of software utilizing ActFax Server.
The vulnerability is caused due to a boundary error when processing an overly long USER name on the FTP Server. This can be exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via an overly long, specially-crafted argument passed to the affected command.